دور المعاهدات الدولية في مكافحة الفساد : دراسة فقهية مقاصدية مقارنة

الملخص EN

I.

The jurisprudential perspective in organizing the relationship of the Islamic state with other countries is considered a stand-alone perspective, clear and constructive, and one of its features is that the foundations of this perspective are what is known as the “House of Covenant, ” which is a group of non-Islamic countries that enter into covenants and covenants with the Islamic state.

The duties of the House of Islam towards the House of the Covenant - in this case - to protect the House of the Covenant from external aggression, and to preserve its security and stability.

From this approach, corruption is a threat to the security and stability of the international community, with which the Islamic countries (currently) entered into relations that are documented by a number of agreements and treaties.

international law, which establishes the role these countries are entrusted with in combating and confronting forms of corruption.

various internally and externally through its international cooperation in this field.

Treaties are considered the best tool in the field of relations and the development of cooperation between the Islamic state and other countries.

Likewise, the existence of a treaty between the Islamic state and another state; On a specific topic or issue, which in itself represents a legal guarantee for the respect and implementation of obligations related to this topic or issue, and accordingly the research paper attempts to address the role of international treaties from the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence in confronting corruption compared to the role played by international treaties in the contemporary world as The focus of the formation of public international law.

key words: Doctrinal perspective on international relations, international treaties, corruption, jurisprudence of international relations