مقارنة ابن عساكر و المزي بين أطراف الصحيحين لخلف الواسطي و لأبي مسعود الدمشقي : مسند النساء لخلف نموذجا (تحقيق، و جمع، و دراسة)‎

الملخص EN

This research aims to find out where the parties of the correct people differ from the successor of Wasiti and Abu Massoud al-Damascene, by comparing Ibn Askar between them, in the margins of the women's support for Khalaf, as well as what al-Mazzi mentioned in the comparison between them.

I followed the inductive approach by tracking the differences between the parties of the correct successor, and Abu Massoud, through the women's support in the parties of Khalaf, his margins for Ibn Askar, and what al-Mazzi mentioned in the masterpiece, and committed to the critical approach, in an attempt to show the right of the differences between Khalaf and Abu Massoud.

I followed the analytical approach by citing the reasons for some of the differences between Khalaf and Abu Massoud.

One of the most important findings: the lack of differences between Khalaf and Abu Massoud in the women's support of the 1304 parties recently in the parties of Khalaf, and that the most differences between them in the mention of Khalaf assaned not mentioned by Abu Massoud, perhaps the accounts of the correct ones adopted by each of them, more than each other in asanid, and that behind the broadest novel of Abu Massoud and more different between hadiths, while Abu Masood is less narrated, More commonly, the hadiths are more common in the right ones, and the validity of what the scholars have gone to say that Khalaf is better and less delusional than Abu Massoud.