القطيعة الحمادية للدولة الفاطمية: دراسة في الخلفيات السياسية والأبعاد المذهبية

الملخص EN

Around 440 / 1048, al-Mu'izz b Badis al-Ziri al-Sanhaji (407-454 / 1016-1062) declared his own state and detached himself from the Fatimid state and its Ismaili doctrine.

his state were loyal to the Fatimids since they were appointed by them as a governor when the Fatimids moved to Cairo in the year 361 / 972.

as a result, many events have occurred, the most important of them is the invasion of Bani Hilal to the Maghreb.

these events have been extensively mentioned with different narrations in primary sources.

however, this estrangement was not the first, in the year 405 / 1015, Hammad b Bulkin b Ziri b Manad al-Sanhaji (408-419 / 1018-1029) declared his rebellion against his nephew.

he gives the pledge of allegiance for abbasids and rejected for Fatimids and he instigated the killing of Ismaili Shiites in Tunis and Beja.

however, it is difficult to find any mentions of his rebellion in primary sources, except ibn Khaldun’s collection al-Ibar (d.

808 /1406).

thus, how true is the narrative of Hammad's estrangement of the Fatimid state? what are the reasons for not mentioning these events in these sources? and what are the historical contexts of this estrangement?