استدراكات الإمام السنوسي (ت 895 ه)‎ على الإمام الرازي (ت 606 ه)‎: عرض ونقد

الملخص EN

The science of speech is one of the most honorable sciences that arose within the framework of the Islamic community, because it is the science that undertakes inference on issues of faith, and respond to the doubts of those who disagree with it, and therefore we have seen scholars of faith throughout the ages confront every outside the approach of Ahl al-Sunnah Wal-Jama'ah, but the theological thought of the Ash'ari doctrine contains between its stages intellectual developments, and systematic transformations that indicate the fertility of this doctrine, and its liberation and rejection of tradition and stagnation, and one of the most prominent of these imams was the flags in the Ash'ari doctrine who rejected tradition, they were liberated from the stalemate of Imam al-Razi in the sixth and seventh centuries ah, as well as imam al-Senussi in the ninth century AH, who had contributed a huge heritage to the clarification of the Islamic faith.

one of the most important motives for choosing this research was: the reference of our sheikh al-Qusi in his book al-Hamamish to the al-Mu’akhat that took pride as mentioned by al-Senussi in different places in Sharh al-Kubra, and there is no doubt that this prompted me to try to research this topic, as a contribution to the service of this great doctrine.

the research came in: an introduction, three sections, and a conclusion.

as for the introduction: it included the motives for choosing this research, and the method followed in it.

as for the three detectives: the first: in the faith of the imitator.

second: in the qualities of meanings between the possible and obligatory.

and third: in the survival of symptoms or non-persistence.

as for the conclusion: i made it for the results of the research.

• research methodology: used in this research: 1- the inductive approach: in collecting and tracking the opinions of the imams al-Razi and al-Senussi from their various aspects.

2- descriptive and analytical approach: in the aspect of presentation and analysis of the views of the two imams.

3- comparative monetary approach: it is the approach that i relied on in the aspect of budget and commentary.

key findings: 1- tradition is valid in the belief of imam al-Razi, and that it is sufficient to judge its owner by faith, while Imam al-Senussi believes that tradition is insufficient in matters of belief.

2- that the attributes of meanings are possible for themselves according to al-Razi and that the self can be active and midwife, while al-Senussi believes that the attributes of al-ani are obligatory by themselves, and it is impossible for the self to be active and midwife.

3- it is permissible for symptoms to remain for two times according to imam al-Razi, while Imam al-Senussi believes that it is impossible for symptoms to remain for two times.