التوجيه اللغوي للقراءات بين الزمخشري والبيضاوي من خلال تفسيريهما: الكشاف وأنوار التنزيل: دراسة مقارنة

الملخص EN

This study is based on the comparison between al-Zamakhshari's and al-Baidawi's attitudes towards the Qira’at that were invalidated because of violating the rules of the Arabic language.

this was done through their two interpretations: al-Kashaf by al-Zamakhshari and anwar al-Tanzil by al-Baidawi.

the study adopted ten aspects in which al-Zamakhshari invalidated the Qira’a for linguistic reasons.

these aspects varied according to the linguistic orientations of the Qira’at; syntactic, morphological, phonological and semantic orientations.

the study is based on the following approaches: the descriptive approach to convey linguists’ views the analytical approach to clarify those views and selectively filter them illustrating what is for and what is against.

the comparative approach to show the points of agreement and disagreement between al-Zamakhshari's and al-Baidawi's attitudes.

the research reached a number of findings most important among them are: al-Baidawi did not disagree with al-Zamakhshari on following the errors of reciters or on invalidating the Qira’at.

on the contrary, he agreed with him on most of the aspects wherein Qira’at were invalidated, and he left a few aspects uncommented on.

some studies have not yet abandoned being controlled by the syntactic approaches in order to prove that al-Zamakhshari preferred the syntactic approach, and have asserted that al-Baidawi disagreed with him because he was Baghdadi and not Basri, which is totally is incorrect.

it cannot be said that al-Baidai followed al-Zamakhshari except through issues that are unagreed upon regarding the linguistic orientation among scholars.

as for the issues that are agreed upon, their study would be of no avail in this respect.

finally, the research came up with a number of recommendations most notable among which are: the linguistic orientation of Qira’at has a linguistic side as well as a side related to the Qira’at as a field.

this orientation is an interdisciplinary field between students of Arabic and those of Qira’at.

we hope that research teams tackle these aspects to reach fruitful findings for both fields.

when we embark on studying the approach of a scholar, we need to depend on the views of that same scholar supporting these views with enough evidences and proofs, and groundless views should be discarded.

when studying the linguistic orientation of Qira’at, the different types of orientation should not be separated in order to conduct a comprehensive study on which a correct Judgement will be based, God willing