الشخصية المسرحية شيلوك بين شكسبير و باكثير : دراسة مقارنة

الملخص EN

The idea of this research revolves around the study of a theatrical character that appeared in the English theater when the writer Shakespeare and then was inspired by the Arab Islamic writer Ali Ahmed Bakathir, who is the character (Shylock).

his religious، cultural and political perception.

the research dealt with defining the term theatrical personality, introducing the two writers, then studying the dimensions of personality in the two plays, and studying the mechanisms of describing their personality.

and the research in its entirety seeks to reveal Bacthir's ability to re-employ the character in a more lively manner that suits the times and its events.

both writers agreed to use the simplest of characters that can be used, i mean stereotypical characters that represent only one aspect of morals or character.

Kazem al-Fayyad, Mikhail and his brother Kassab and Abdullah al-Fayyad represent the Palestinian revolution, and Shylock and the rest of his zionist men represent the ugly face of the occupier, as they agreed in using the class aspect of the characters, Shakespeare used the character of Mr.

(Shylock), the servant (Lancelot), the lady (Porcia) and the maid (Nerpsa), and Bakathir used the character of the master (Kadhim Bek al-Fayyad), the servant (Rajab), (Abdullah al-Fayyad), the servant (Othman), and so on.

both writers agreed on the social dimension of Shylock, in terms of the nature of the character and his work, although he was much more accurate in choosing the names of his characters in terms of the name's indication of the character and his work.

the two writers differed in their use of the monologue, as it was mentioned by Bakathir, and it was not mentioned by Shakespeare, and it was mentioned by Bakathir once, and perhaps this is due to its lack of popularity at this time, or that its presence will make the viewer bored due to the lack of movement that the spectator is accustomed to on stage.

the human dimension is stronger for Shakespeare than for buckthorn ; because Shakespeare evoked feelings of sympathy for Shylock in us, and gave him the opportunity to justify and defend his actions as he portrayed us as a multi-dimensional human being، and not just a monstrous, hateful beast cursed by people.

the economic dimension is much stronger for Bakhtiar than for Shakespeare ; because Shylock Shakespeare was passive, waiting for opportunities until they became available to him, and after that he gained control of the economic field, while Shylock with much was positive, creating opportunities-himself-that would enable him to impoverish the Arabs and burden them with a lot of debts, then control their lands and the financial and economic field.