في تواطؤ “المؤمن” و ”المواطن” و تعويض الإلهي بالإنساني “ماكس شتيرنر” و “نيتشه” : استئناف المشروع و امتداداته

الملخص EN

What attracts attention is that politics is like religion, claiming to carry out the "education" of the human being and to bring him to the realization of his "essence" and "his purpose," that is, to make him a true human being.

Religion means a "true believer," and politics means a "real citizen".

And if we turned our gaze far away, it would have been evident to us that they are no less entangled in the religious groove, and that we would see that they themselves impose an apparent devotion, a "destiny" on man, with the desire to be divine, human.

Thus, what should be learned from this is that the essence of a human being requires that it be morality, freedom and humanity.

Following this type of analysis, Stirner quickly discovers that "morals have become from now on purely human and completely separated from the religion that they have historically issued, nothing prevents it from becoming an actual religion itself." At that time, he did not have to disobey him to claim that "my case is neither divine nor human, it is neither right nor good, just nor free," it is mine, it is not general but - singular, just as I am singular, nothing to me is above me.

And because the mighty are the ones who choose their ancestors and their ancestors, see the eloquent speech of "Nietzsche" in his text in "Thus Speaks Zarathustra." And if we follow these highly consistent ideas, it will be possible for us to realize then the position on whose level Stirner poses the face of his problem, and he formulated it within the following horizon: "You will not be able to deal between you in your own name and for some of you to be some of what you are, except If you are singular." The matter raises possibilities of the question: What was the meaning of the one and his ownership - that which was forgotten - when he appeared and what is its current significance, and what are its roots in contemporary German thought?