سد الذرائع بين القرافي و الشاطبي : دراسة مقارنة

الملخص EN

Blocking pretenses has been studied extensively and numerously by the fundamentalists, due to its close relevance to the eventual consequence for bringing benefits and preventing mischiefs,and this interest was given by Al-Imam Al-Qarafi and Al-Shatibi to the rule of blocking pretenses.

Where can the aspects of agreement and disagreement appear between Al-Qarafi and Al-Shatibi concerning the rule of blocking pretenses ? Based on this issue, the study will seek to show the aspects of agreement and disagreement between the two Imamas in terms of division deduction and application.

depending the comparative analytical descriptive methodology.

And that's through gathering its datasets from its sources and analysing them, then comparing these data to specify the aspects of agreement and disagreement.

And that is through two main sections: -the concept of blocking pretenses and its proof by Al-Malikiah.

Then Elucidating the aspects of agreement and disagreement between Al-Qarafi and Al-Shatibi concerning the rule of blocking pretenses; and I have concluded that: they've agreed on the rule's proof in the concederation of the mischief's consequence, whereas Al-Shatibi was precise about it; as he made it branched from concederation of the consequence and regarding the intention of the legislator