توضيح الصورة في مسألة الضرورة : دراسة نقدية تحليلية

الملخص EN

There has been much controversy over the issue of poetic necessity.

is it a defect or an advantage? does the poet fall into it out of necessity or intentionally? is it possible to review and revise the verse to take it out of the realm of necessity, or is the matter difficult? that is why this study came to highlight the most important issues and confine them to two approaches that do not accept criticism without strong and solid evidence ; the comparative approach and the historical approach.

these two approaches seize the dimensions of the image, draw its borders accurately, and stand on the origin of the word and the method of its construction as intended by the poet, as perceived by the critic, or as narrated by the narrators contrary to what the poet wrote.

some necessities clearly involve the craft of the poet in them and you can assert with certainty that the poet did not put them in this construction, but opinion needs evidence, and conjecture does not build knowledge, knowing that the poet's thinking differs from the critic's thinking, and the poet-critic differs from both of them because he sees with a third eye, and whoever goes through the world of construction will discover its secrets, even if they are not clear to others, so he knows nature from the workmanship, from the inevitability of necessity to its illusion and from the anxiety of the text to its certainty.