ما يجب أن يعمم الداعية فيه القول و ما لا يجب و آثاره النفسية على المدعو

الملخص EN

The research aims to clarify a very important matter, which is when does the preacher generalize in his saying, and when does he not generalize ? what are the psychological implications of that generalization ? if the preacher spoke about a matter of action that does not accept exception or partiality, he would generalize in his saying, and use general formulas indicating that ; if he talks about god almighty, and that all perfection is necessary for him, and every deficiency is impossible for him, then he generalizes his saying without abbreviation or exception, so he says in the form of generality: god is capable of everything, so he uses the formula “All” or any formula that indicates comprehensiveness and generality to include the rule of all its members.

because that is contrary to justice, fairness, and scientific trust, so whoever finds a mistake or a contradiction among some Muslims should not generalize the saying to all of them, and accuse them of the qualities that are present in some of them; rather, the ruling is allocated to those who do it without generalization or generalization ; because the wrong generalization causes the formation of a corrupt preconceived view that prevents rapprochement, communication, and understanding ; therefore, the error of those who withdraw the judgment of Muslims in general with extremism and terrorism without exclusion or exclusion appears, it negatively affects the psyche of the invitees, and in this research I followed the documentary approach, the historical approach, and the comparative approach.

lord with wisdom and good advice), for wisdom requires putting something in its place, and wrong generalization is contrary to that, and also that wrong generalization in judging others generates dissonance and disagreement ; because he establishes psychological barriers between the invitee and the different ideas and approaches presented to him, so he refrains from hearing them-even if they are true-, and the researcher recommends holding courses, seminars, and conferences for workers in the field of advocacy ; to show the seriousness of the wrong generalization in judging others, generates dissonance and disagreement ; because he establishes psychological barriers between the invitee and the different ideas and approaches presented to him, so he refrains from hearing them-even if they are true-, and the researcher recommends holding courses, seminars, and conferences for workers in the field of advocacy ; to show the seriousness of the wrong generalization in judging others, as well as singling out this subject in the study curricula in a way that befits its importance ; due to its positive and negative impact on the invitees.