التنظيم القانوني لقبول الكمبيالة بالتدخل : دراسة مقارنة

الملخص EN

This study aims to identify the legal status of the interfering person in accepting the bill of exchange, as well as clarifying the formal and objective conditions for acceptance.

the significance of the study also traces the acceptance of the commercial bill of exchange by interfering, in addition to clarifying and defining the concept of acceptance by intervention and identifying the cases in which acceptance is permissible.

the research problem revolves around the clarification of the legal regulation resulting from accepting the commercial bill of exchange by intervention.

as for the solution of the problem, it revolves around clarifying the legal status of the person or third party, who accepts the bill of exchange by intervention, in preparation of their fulfillment on the due date, to contribute to the payment of the liability and to achieve stability in transactions.

a comparative, analytical and descriptive approach was adopted through describing and analysing legal texts and comparing them with other legal texts based on the Yemeni commercial law, advocated with explanations and jurisprudential views.

the study reached to a number of results, the most important of which is : the Yemeni commercial law no.

(32) of 1991 does not stipulate that the person accepting the intervention be one of the parties to the bill of exchange, he could be unfamiliar to it, a former or latter contractor in conformity with the bill of exchange.

the study has presented a set of recommendations including a suggestion to the yemeni legislator to set a clear definition of the meaning of acceptance of intervention to make it easier for researchers and those interested in understanding what it is and its general framework, since this definition of the concept of acceptance by intervention leads to defining the specific framework from a legal point of view.