أوجه استشهادات النحاة بشعر الأعشى الكبير : دراسة بعض النماذج في ضوء أصول الاحتجاج النحوي

الملخص EN

This is a brief research paper that dealt with the aspects of grammarians' citations of Al-A'sha's great poetry, in light of the principles of grammatical protest.

It focused in its presentation on the extent to which Al-A'sha's poetry conforms to the philosophy of constructing grammatical rules and its principles and clarified some of the issues that were discussed based on invoking Al-A'sha's poetry because he was one of the poets of the first class in pre-Islamic times His poetry is one of the finest poems suitable for guidance in establishing the rules of Arabic grammar.

The aim of this study is : to present the opinions of grammarians based on his poetry and the controversial issues that arise from it and to clarify the anomalous and weak grammatical rules based on them .The study assumed that Al-A'sha's poetry includes grammatical methods and styles that are not found in many poems and it sought to confirm or deny this according to the results.

After using an inductive descriptive and analytical approach the study reached results including : It is permissible to delete (kan and became) after (madh) and use it in the predicate with a few.

It is permissible to delete the predicate (inna) with a broken hamzas if it is known beforehand.

whether the noun is an indefinite noun or is a definite article and whether (inna) is repeated or not.

The lightened "that" of the heavy word "an" works in apparent and implied nouns provided that it is preceded by knowledge calculation suspicion or the like but its effect is less in apparent nouns.

The addition may occur meaning in.

It is permissible to separate the genitive from the genitive whether it is by the genitive and the genitive, or by the adverbs or by something else in poetry or otherwise with narrational analogical and explanatory evidence.