مطالبة النافي بالدليل

الملخص EN

Al-Nafi's claim to the evidence is one of the different issues among the fundamentalists, and they placed different titles for it, which confused it with other issues such as the issue (inference of nothingness) and the issue (elemental withdrawal).

I wanted to know the truth of the issue and the statements contained therein, weighing what I thought was right and indicating the relationship between them and their peers.

In this research, I followed the approach of induction, then analysis, then deduction.

I followed the statements of scientists in the matter, and I mentioned the evidence of each team on what the editor at issue had said, and compared their statements until I reached the origin of this issue, an attempt to adhere to the rules of scientific research and its foundations as much as possible.

At the end of the research, I came to a number of conclusions, including: The sum of the statements in the matter is due to only three; the first is that the denier is required to give evidence in theoretical matters, provided that he claims science to negate science, the second is not required to do so, and the third is his claim to proof in denying illegality.

that the perception of the negation of the Shariah clause is either unanimous, stated or measured, with the Mosque having an objection or unconditional, and that the question of the inference of nullity is more important than the issue of the claim of the denier for evidence; Inference by nullity is one of the evidences of a ruling's negation, and there is no difference between approval and inference by nullity in terms of their respective meaning, only difference in how the inference is based or the approach of the inference, and that inference by nullity is an argument against the truth of God Almighty and may be pronounced by others.