مظاهر إخلال الإدارة بالتزام تنفيذ الأحكام القضائية الصادرة ضدها: دراسة مقارنة "الجزائر، فرنسا، مصر"

الملخص EN

The phenomenon of the administration's refusal to implement the administrative judicial rulings issued against it has become so widespread that the legislator and the judiciary have to deal with this phenomenon by all legal and judicial means.

its refusal appears in several forms, such as laxity in implementation or partial implementation, the maximum of which is an explicit refusal, in addition to its resorting to all methods that help it, such as its adherence to problems in implementation, issuing a law from the legislator that restores the canceled decision to its previous strength, which is what is called legislative correction.

however, these manifestations still exist in the judicial arena, which necessitated examining the applications of comparative judiciary in confronting the intransigent management methods, and the extent to which it was able to put an end to them.

let us conclude that the comparative judiciary has confronted the administration with all the legal means that allowed it to stand up to it, as the French judiciary was the first in its positions, and its insight into all its maneuvers, which supported the position of the legislation in devoting the mechanisms to ensure that.