الرقابة الدستورية و حماية الحقوق والحريات الأساسية بالمغرب: دراسة تحليلية مقارنة

الملخص EN

In implementation of the requirements of Article 133 of the 2011 Constitution, Parliament approved in its two chambers the Organic Law No.

86.15, relating to the setting of payment terms and procedures for the unconstitutionality of a law, on February 6, 2018.

The unconstitutionality of a law and the procedures for preparing, deliberating and voting on it, in accordance with the provisions of Articles 84 and 85 of the Constitution.

According to the pronunciation of Resolution 70-18 of the Constitutional Court on 03/06/2018.

This organic law was referred to the Constitutional Court, according to Chapter 85 of the Constitution, and it decided on the constitutionality of its provisions, recognized the non-conformity of the organic law with the Constitution, and made several observations regarding it.

The thing that compelled the government to amend the regulatory law, taking into account the observations of the Constitutional Court.

On April 25, 2022, the House of Representatives approved in its plenary session the second version of the draft Organic Law 86.15, unanimously arranging the legal implications of the Constitutional Court Decision No.

70/18 in this regard mentioned above.

The new project was referred to the Board of Advisors.

Pending the issuance of the organic law, and its referral again to the Constitutional Court to decide on its constitutionality, we wonder in our modest analysis, did the new text respond to the Constitutional Court's observations.

Is the text considered up to the aspirations of Article 133 of the Constitution regarding the protection of the basic rights and freedoms of the citizen?