المحكم و المتشابه بين التلقي الأوصلي و التأويل الصوفي : كتاب رد معاني الآيات المتشابهات إلى معاني الآيات المحكمات ل "ابن عربي" أنموذجا

الملخص EN

The issue of “Al-Mohkam Wal-Motashabeh” raises enriching controversy among fundamentalists and Quran scholars, and it reveals levels of reading in their approach for Quranic text through mental argument and religious text- to achieve awareness of the text through time motion, that is, the text in history.

The research studies this issue between fundamental reading which -in essence-depends on syntactic reading and reciting for Ayet Al-Mohkam Wal-Motashabeh in Soret AL Imran (Ayeh V) and Sofi interpretation which basically depends on the sufficiency of the text, taking Quran as a whole linguistic unit that exemplifies one existional fact whatever its various phases in realty, mind and history.

In addition, the research tries to investigate dialect of ambiguity and exposition of Quranic text, which embodies more profound argument between awesome and ecstatic , mind and faith.

Moreover, it tries to reveal the instant of interpretation as a surmise moment as Martin Heidegger concluded, which springs out of the self of the reader/the interpreter, through a scries of successive inheritance from an age to another, which in turn exemplifies the argumenl between past and the present about the text as Hans Gadamer concluded.