التركيب و السياق بين النفي و الاستفهام في سورة الكهف

الملخص EN

Was and remains the Holy Quran focus of attention of scholars, the focus of their research in every place and time, it is certain Their inexhaustible of all the sciences and knowledge, dealing with the nuances, any word or character or the movement of which fit the location and agree the intent of both catches Employed interpretation and expressing or did not realize, Grammarians and who have had the right of contribution is a manifestation of the effort grammar Quran deserve thanks and praise.

The between specialists in the science of the Koran and the interpretation the status of the Cave, holiness, and the reward of reads, or saves, leading the researchers to study different aspects of She just to study for the standing of this research as well as those studies which overflowed the Pens researchers and reveals some things in science as increased on revealed by the above research in different disciplines.

The nature of the research required to address the first two Aksmh exile in the cave, and the second section deals with the question in the cave.

Intended message to the study of Arabic sentence in the context of exile and the question as it came in the cave in terms of patterns of different nature, and the research on the extraction of linguistic data from the reality of Sura compared with the views of the grammarians, and this requires access in depth books on the linguistic heritage of the Arab, to discuss the material taken from Sura in the light of the views of the grammarians and discuss these views.

And dealt with in the first section the actual sentence and nominal in the context of exile Asthllth the sense of exile and collected tools exile in the sura and divided to deny the case, and denies the past, and deny the future, the study said patterns of each tool, as contained in the sura and the role of the function of grammatical and semantic.

The second part was about the actual sentence and nominal in the context of the question Asthllth question the sense of linguistic and terminological tools and then examined the question contained in the cave, following the same way as was done in the first section.

I have tried in this research to avoid lengthy and digressions on topics, and therefore came Find the volume of information obtained by, as I tried my best to centralize the oldest and without warning, may reduce the importance of.