الانسحاب من معاهدات الحد من حيازة الأسلحة و منع الانتشار النووي

الملخص EN

Withdraw from the treaty is a legal issue will the individual to the State party to a multilateral treaty an expression of sovereignty and aimed it to the decomposition of the implementation of the obligations contained therein, which would result in the treaty ceased production in its legal response.

That the treaties on arms reduction and nonproliferation are treaties of a special nature, due to the treaties of particular interest, would prejudice the direct threat to international peace and security, and that these treaties are keen on the principle of universality because they can not achieve its goals and purposes for which entered into for which only the accession by all States, in particular those with nuclear activities and has not withdrawn any of them from membership, because the withdrawal of one sponsor the launch of the nuclear arms race, which represents a serious threat to international peace and security, so the ultimate goal of the international community must be to work on nuclear disarmament and not only prevent their spread and to ensure that the monopoly of possession, however, the lack of nuclear-weapon States are themselves permanent members of the Security Council, so the license to withdraw from this Treaty if there were text explicit and definitively out, must be used in a narrower border, but a strong case, and the application strict conditions for withdrawal, taking into account the non-prejudice to the obligations and commitments that prevent the spread of nuclear weapons, and not to exploit the withdrawal to undermine the efforts of the United Nations aimed at nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation.