موقف الأصوليين من النهي المطلق و أثره في اختلاف الفقهاء

الملخص EN

It is known for every researcher in Principles of Fiqh that semantics in terms of formats commissioning divided on the order and prohibition, I have seen it is necessary to type in search small on prohibition, and what was the subject divergent, and has a significant impact in different jurists decided to write on one issue it , an absolute prohibition and its impact on different scholars, meant absolute forbidden is forbidden free for clues that indicate that the prohibition of the act necessary or described or described next.

The divided search on the front and booted three sections, assigns first section to define a forbidding and formula and uses have been and conditions, while the second section Vavrdth to position statement fundamentalists sign forbidding absolute judgments, and dealt with in the third section the impact of the difference in significance forbidding the absolute difference jurists.

Given the effects of the many resulting from differing fundamentalists in a sign forbidding the provisions were limited speech on أثرین two outputs for differences in forbidding absolute all the indications that the prohibition due to the act or part, or to describe a necessary or description adjacent to the forbidden, and divided this section on demands of the first effects of the absolute prohibition in worship vowed to fast on Eid and secondly in shighaar transactions praying to Allah Almighty to help us to serve the sublime Sharia, and success comes only from God.