الأسس الفلسفية لنقد المنطق الصوري عند جون ديوي

الملخص EN

This research analyzes the criticism of logic made by the American philosopher John Dewey.

Dewey's criticism of logic is based mainly on the idea of the formal property of logic, which distorts logic and deprives it from its procedural aspect since the days of Aristotle.

According to Dewey, logic does not allow the separation between form and matter, nor between induction and deduction, nor between logic and lifestyles.

Therefore, logic today is in need of radical reform that makes it more closely related to the methods Of modern sciences and human life, as witnessed by humans on a daily basis.

Dewey concludes that the laws of logic are just successful habits since there is an experiential continuum between reality and thought, between form and matter, and between practical procedures and abstract ideas.

However, the laws of logic are mere inventions developed in the light of the practical procedures which we take in life, art, science and behavior.

What is important in logic today is not to determine whether the propositions are true or false, but whether the propositions of logic are able to solve our problems.

This research paper discusses several issues, the most important of which are the following: - The relationship of logic with philosophy.

- The relationship of logic with science.

- The nature of logic from Dewey's perspective.

- A conclusion that includes an analysis of Dewey's logical ideas.