دراسة مقارنة للصفحة المعرفية لمقياس ستانفورد-بينيه للذكاء الصورة الخامسة لدى عينة من طلاب المرحلة الثانوية المتفوقين و المتأخرين دراسيا

الملخص EN

The phenomenon of different ability to academic achievement among students to each other of the biggest problems facing the educational system and hinder the school to play their role fully in formed him study this phenomenon as one of urgent necessity to identify the characteristics and potential of students with levels of realizable divergent so that we can prepare them educationally and Talemiaali basis of this knowledge to try to take advantage as much as possible of their energies.

And have shaped the various measures of intelligence detection of individuals with mental capacity upper and outstanding and talented, so I went to the researcher the following hypotheses : Hypotheses Of The Study@Z 1.

No page featured superior knowledge, curriculum latecomers "sample study" on a scale interface Stanford's five.

2.

No statistically significant differences between the mean scores (superior, backward) subtests in the curriculum, and the factors and percentage on a scale IQ interface - Stanford's five.

3.

No statistically significant differences between mean scores of superior students (males and females) in a sub-tests, and factors and rates on a scale IQ interface - Stanford's five.

Sample@Z The sample consists of 60 students and school Talibhllsna (2009/ 2010, 2010/ 2011) and the sample is divided into : 30 (15 students, 15 students) category (a) Over achievement academically selected Alerbai top as the total for the first phase is 205 degrees Vtm determine the sample who received degrees (185 degrees or above) of the females were identified Alerbai up for boys who have received degrees (188 and above) from high school test scores (MDIs) for the first phase of those available to them the conditions of the sample 30 (15 students, 15 students) category (b) Under achievement Alerbai minimum total grade point 205 degree Vtm determine the sample who received degrees (140 degrees or less) for females, were identified sample of those who received (132 or less) for males note that the minimum 85 degrees of success have been the exclusion of the students for the years Tools:@ Form the initial data for the student (on the same page to correct the meter) Stanford Binet scale of intelligence is the fifth (the description of the test, the features of Change from the previous version) Quote and Prepared by: Mohammed Taha, Abdul Abdel Samie is located, under the supervision and review of Mr.

Mahmoud Abu Nile (2011).

Statistical Methods: Average and standard deviation, kurtosis and the degrees of torsion between the sample.

test (t) to calculate the implications of the differences between disparate groups The selaa (outstanding, latecomers) .

Test (u) Mann and Whitney to calculate the implications of the differences between disparate groups (males, females Results@Z 1.

That no page of knowledge characteristic of both the winners and the level of significance scores were higher than average and the highest in several aspects up to levels of excellence and also the later curriculum (study sample) said Page cognitive decline in scores in the detection and quantitative processing visual while won the mid-level in several subtests on a scale Stanford is home to the intelligence of the fifth 2.

No statistically significant differences between excelling academically and later in the factors and subtests on the Stanford scale interface is the fifth Tfoukan by 0.001 significance as it has proved the second assumption depending on the results of the study 3.

Statistically significant differences between males and females excelling in the subtests on the scale of the Stanford home in the knowledge and reasoning quantitative non-verbal and reasoning liquid verbal in favor of males, while the female latecomers a higher rate in the subtests are inferred liquid Allfezewalmarafh non-verbal and working.