تحليل الخطاب النقدي بالاعتماد على المدونات اللغوية : أخبار حرب غزة نموذجا

الملخص EN

The current study tries to apply corpus-based linguistic approaches to critical discourse analysis.

The data has been collected from Al Arabiya and Al Jazeera news during Gaza war in the second half of 2014.

The final corpus includes 528641 words, spread over 1525 text (31% belongs to Al Arabiya while Al-Jazeera texts represent 69%).

The researchers have analysed the corpus quantitatively through using special tools to determine the frequency, concordance and investigate its collocation.

Through an inductive procedure for the analysis outcome, the words has been categorised in its related semantic fields.

The research results indicate that there are sort of similarities in one hand.

The similarities can be seen through using similar words that deliver the news, and describing the relevant political movement.

On the other hand, the result implies serval differences between the two channels.

The differences have been found relate to the general frame of presenting the conflict as well as to the type of words used in each Chanel.

While Al Arabiya tends to focus on official international vision, Al jazeera provides more detailed narratives and attends to cultural, historical and social circumstances surrounding the event.

In regards to the words preferences, Al arabiya seems to prefer what is regarded to be "objectiv words" which does not reveal clear attitudes.

Al jazeera, however, tends to utilise certain words, which involve cultural connotations, and reveal a clear stance toward the event.