تطوير قابلية المتعلم في رسم الأشكال الزخرفية وفق طريقة العصف الذهني

الملخص EN

Methods and experiments out carry we unless predicted be cannot directions .results its probing in work field teaching in way routine the change to endeavouring and, Hence institutions educational the of attitudes the with agreeing and, bilitysta-datum s’learner the enhancing or, effort or time reducing odsmeth to probably leading ways educational novel for search to and permanently is which zeitgeist the with harmonize to attempting attempts researcher the, moveable and, changeable, renewable with line in and, Thus.

innovation and memory, understanding’ erslearn the influences which method a, ornamentation Islamic ingteach in Brainstorming of method the of use the investigate to into research his divides researcher the, methodology research the developing of problem the discusses chapter first The.

chapters four the to according shapes decorative the draw to ability s’learner the .brainstorming of method of those as, results its which experiment this does researcher The the of aim the achieve to semester complete a during deavoursen He.

beginning the at hidden are, experiments earnest other of method the of validity of range the knowing is which research engineering are research the of limits objective The.

shapes tivedecora draw to learners of ability the developing in brainstorming of Department/learners stage second are limits spatial Its.

tationornamen Islamic designing in basis hidden a representing shapes temporal The.

Kufa of University/Education of Faculty/Education Art .(2011-2010 (year academic the is limit brainstorming, ornamentation Islamic of literature the with deals erresearch the, it In.

side theoretical the handles chapter second The -brainstorm execute to how and, characteristics and features its ing presenting of method a is Brainstorming.state supposed s’leader to incentive’ learners stimulating question a of form a in subject a association free to similar way a in it solve to suggestions present their show to learners liberating via psychoanalysis of school the in and, opinions his on elaborating on goes learner the when siondiscus or objection, interruption preventing, one by one opinions they if even them rejecting from learners of group the hindering empty to learners enable to is This.

executable-non and unreal are recording with synchronizing problem the solve to suggestions their from ones suitable the sift to comes isolation of role the, Later.

them choose to developed are solutions good, Then.

ones unsuitable the learners the by upon agreed solution optimal the be to fittest the so teacher the by planned and arranged is this All.

teacher their and in brainstorming of method the executing of standards the of edgeknowl complete a demand which subject the of aims the fulfill to as ornamentation Islamic of teacher the, experiment the In.

teaching .researcher the is four inspects researcher the, side theoretical the considering After studies these But.

subjects similar with dealing studies previous .society research the specifies, statistics mathematical via, searcherre the, three chapter In.environments coeducation-non., e.i, mentsenviron educational mixed-non in fields theoretical on concentrate represent them of six Fifty.

learners female and male) 57 (are They .ones male) 7 (and learners female) 21 (of composed is group talexperimen The.

groups two of consists which sample research the (6 (and learners female) 22 (includes group control The.

stormingbrain of method the by taught are They).

28 (is number total Their used is method lecture ordinary The).

28 (is total Their.

ones male .mentsorna of accomplishment practical the in needed materials and, inglearn, sex, age in matched are groups two The.

them teaching in depends researcher the, requirements research with conformity as such means statistical using methodology experimental .test-T and, freedom of degree, deviation standard, mean In is it, Also.

ornamentation Islamic of subject the teaching in stormingbrain of method the apply to possibility the is result important most studies previous whereas subjects practical teaching in stormingbrain on rely also can We.

methods two the between coefficient tionvaria any without teaching in way traditional the follow to possible just brainstorming use, only subjects theoretical studying on focus of group the make, lecture ordinary the of monotony the break to process the coordinating to teacher the of role the restrict and tionornamenta Islamic of subject the of learning the of most do learners the, connection this In.

it of sinew a being than rather learning of are group experimental the in learners the that notices researcher are they, is that, group control the in those than stimulated more the of spite in motives their growing renovation by interacted more .outputs the of constancy .novelty in factor crucial no is there that concludes researcher The the concerns as different not are methods two the of outputs The no is there that indicates experiment The.

research under subject and) lecturing (method teaching traditional the between difference and develop to ability the has and emergence its in old is mentationorna Islamic that inferred is It.

brainstorming of method modern the method teaching new the to conforms it where content its in ferencedif any without and times the of spirit the with accordance in renew the suggests researcher The.lagging no with one old the as well as Kufi square teaching in method brainstorming of effect the of study .calli