النقض عند الأصوليين و أثره في التعليل : دراسة أصولية تحليلية

الملخص EN

This study is concerned with showing one of the rationales of cause, which is considered one of its nullifications by fundamentalists, i.e.

challenge.

Thus I defined challenge in language and terminology and sects of fundamentalists.

The study aimed at presenting a fundamental study that confirms the solemnity of fundamentalists’ approach in induction, pleading and argumentation.

I applied the inductive and analytical methodologies as an approach to deal with the sections of the topic.

The researcher reached to a set of results, including: the sayings of people had divided into several sects in challenge, ascribe saying to the one who said it and, actually, they are ten sects while assumptions in challenge are nine.

This is because cause whether it should be texted, assumed or inducted.

The rule had defaulted whether by hindrance ; elapse of condition or beyond them.

Challenge, as agreed upon, cannot be made between two divisions and even by the majority of evidence of cause of origin for measurement shall not nullify because its condition, the evidence of cause of origin shouldn’t tackle the branch.

As challenge cannot be made in the texted cause if it is texted with a decisive text in the privatization of cause.

Challenge shall not be made where cause is not applicable.

Should the cause is assumed, it shall not be made.

If cause is, clearly, proved in both of them, thus objection occures.

Then it shall prove, with its generality, the cause in the place of challenge.

In addition, to that challenge shall not be applied if there is an exception, whether the cause it cut or assumed.

Most of the dispute over challenge is verbal.

The researcher recommended identifying the cause, its conditions and its nullifications so as to know what it should be a cause.

The researchers should pay attentions that the disputs between the fundamentalists is, often, verbal.

Therefore, they should explain it by paying attention to implications of their wording and to combine them as possible.

If the disputs is real, it is not for anything other than difference in points of view and all people are rewarded by Allah, the Almighty.