رواة الصحيحين الذين تكلم فيهم ابن حبان في كتابة المجروحين : دراسة نقدية تطبيقية

الملخص EN

This is a study of some of the Hadeeth narrators who were negatively reported by Ibn Hibban, and the method Al-Bukhari and Muslim usedin selecting the Hadeeths of those questioned narrators to authenticate their narrations in the SaHeeH.

After studying the status of those narratorsin Ibn Hibban's book, the researcher concludes the following: (a)The narrators whose narrations are judged to be full of (mistake and illusion), are more likely tobe classified asreliable, truthful, acceptable, and mistaken truthful.

(b) For the narrators whose narrations are accused of confusion according to Ibn Hibban, the two Imams did not authenticatethe narrations after this confusion, nor were the denied narrations mentioned in the SaHeeHayn.

(c) Ibn Hibban hesitated in judgingone of the seven narrators, Omran Ibn Muslim Al-Munqari, and said that he sought intuitive inspiration from Allah to guide him to the right verdict.But after studying Al-Munqari'sstatus, it appears that he is acceptable.

Moreover, those who judge narrators only by the narration of Al-Bukhari and Muslim as being sound are mistaken.

It depends on the consideration of the narration after the narrator and its condition,and on the authenticating of a narration by one of the Imamsas being just and soundly verified besidethe narrator'srighteousness; however, this was limited to those whose narrations were included by Ibn Hibban in the fundamentals not in Al-Mutaaba`aat (thefollow up) or citations.