القراءة المرجعية في مآخذ ابن معقل على شراح المتنبي

الملخص EN

This study is a reading in a book (entitled the approach to commentators of the Diwane of Abi Tayeb Elmoutanabi of Ibn Maakil Alazdi, the approach to commentators of Altabrizi and Kindi's comments as modals.

Adopting the following problimatic: How did Ibn Maakil receive these comments? Did he add something to these comments? was he able in his approach to both ELkindi and Altabrizi to produce a parallel work (text) to the one mentioned previously? What means a real contribution to produce either an efficient significance or it did not output the framework of the original source to which it referred