منهج أبي عبد الله بن عمرون فيما أثر من كتابه "شرح المفصل"

الملخص EN

This study has been made to reveal the most important methodologies of Imam & Scholar (Ibn Amroun) with regard to what has been concluded from his book titled (Sharh Al-Mofasal).

He is the remainder of this science and the Arabian scholars as his inheritage run out except his views and statements transferred by his successors.

Ibn Amroun's name is: Mohammed Bin Mohammed Bin Ali Bin Abi Saeed Bin Amroun Jamaluddin Abo Abdullah Alhalabi Alnahawi.

He nicknamed "Aba Abdellah" and "Jamaluddin".

He was born nearly in 596 H and died in 649 H.

One of his inheritage is the chapter titled (What can be morphologized and what can't be) which is a part of his lost book (Sharh Al-Mofasal) which was kept by his student "Bahauddin Bin Al-Nahas Alhalabi who dies in 698 H, author of a book titled (Sharh Al-Moqarab) which is called (Al-Ta'leeqah) and he reported it completely in addition to contents scattered in some books.

I tended to care for this inheritage, so I made this study to identify his most important methodologies and highlighten this rarely-studied scholastic personality because of the little inheritage we came to, so to reveal the ambiguity of this personality is one of this study most motivations.

I have started with an introduction includes a brief life-history of Ibn Amroun, his era which was crowded with events and temptations in addition to the factors which have impact on his personality.

After that I showed the features of his topic presentation which drew my attention in six summarized chapters but reveal his personality and his methodology of topic presentation.

I talked about his phrasing in terms of clarity or lack of it, his method to make the reader get his idea in spite of complexity and richness of his phrasing.

It has appeared that he was keen to make his phrasing clear and introduce his ideas to the reader in orderly method and easy phrases through adoption of some methods which help the reader to get his ideas.

I also treated the feature of digression and its most important properties and nature.

This study revealed that this feature was present because of his frequent questions, his concern of grammatical controversy, his keen on fact-finding, multiple and diverse sources of persons and books.

This reveals the wealth of his knowledge, his learning from the ancestors Masters of grammarians, other interpreters, linguists and readers, so his digression was useful.

I have showed the high level of Ibn Amroun in Grammar & writing.

His sharpness and count for his ideas shows his character strength as we find in his answers, strong probabilities and deductions.

This study revealed his accuracy and authentication of what reported which indicate that Ibn Amroun is one of the Master Scholars who studied what they reported.

He was mostly keen on attribution of views and evidences, so he attributed the views to their Sayers and cared for (Sanad) in some points.

We have found through this study his keen on fairness of rules and views as well as non-affectation or advocacy of tendency.

Who consider his phrasing, he will find a lot of views and new non-precedent tendencies which indicate his accuracy of consideration and creativity.

This study revealed his situation towards the grammatical fundamentals: acceptance by usage in its kinds, consensus, analogy as it showed that he invoked to that he invoked to these fundamentals in many issues, to what accepted by usage and to what consented.

He also accept or refuse based on consistence or non-consistence with analogy although he thinks that acceptance by usage is preferred to analogy.

We found that he cared for justification for rules, views, tendencies and precedence which indicates that he had a unique mentality used these evidences to serve Arabic Langue.

It showed also his situation towards poetry as he declared it in more positions.

What is valid for poetry is not valid for prose but shouldn't have anything contrary to the agreed Grammar.

He cared also for terminologies and limits.

All of this and the other things revealed by this study is a proof of the Mastership of Ibn Amroun and his diligence to help the reader.

This reveals the reason for frequent reports about him in spite of rarely-inherence we came to.

Finally, I ask Allah for this study to be one of those equitable towards this rarely- known science and to bring some milestones of his personality.

I also ask Allah (Glorified and Exalted) straightforwardness in saying and working.