العلاقة بين المحكمة الجنائية الدولية و المحاكم الوطنية

العناوين الأخرى

Relationship between the international criminal court and the national courts

مقدم أطروحة جامعية

الحوامدة، هاني ناصر

مشرف أطروحة جامعية

الحوامدة، غالب عواد

الجامعة

جامعة جرش

الكلية

كلية الحقوق

دولة الجامعة

الأردن

الدرجة العلمية

ماجستير

تاريخ الدرجة العلمية

2018

الملخص العربي

جاءت المحكمة الجنائية الدولية عقب تجارب قضائية دولية في المجال الجنائي، تمثلت في نمط القضاء الدولي الجنائي المؤقت ( المحاكم العسكرية الدولية - المحاكم الجنائية الدولية الخاصة)، و زيادة على كون المحكمة الجنائية الدولية دائمة الوجود وعكس سابقاتها - محاكم القضاء الدولي الجنائي المؤقت – فإن اختصاصها بنظر الجرائم الدولية المحدودة في نظام روما لم يكن اختصاصا ذا أولوية مثل القضاء الدولي الجنائي المؤقت بل كان اختصاصا تكميلي، أي الأولوية للقضاء الوطني على حساب المحكمة الجنائية الدولية، تطبيقا لما يعرف بمبدأ التكامل أحد المبادئ الرئيسية للمحكمة الجنائية الدولية.

لكن هذا المبدأ والذي تخضع له المحكمة الجنائية الدولية في مباشرة اختصاصا تدور حوله بعض التساؤلات منها ما يخص مضمونه، حدود تطبيقه، ولعل النقطة الثانية - حدود تطبيقه- هي المهمة في كل هذا والمجيبة لغيرها من التساؤلات، غير أن التطرق إلى حدود تطبيق مبدأ التكامل لن يكون ممكن إلا من خلال إرجاع المسألة إلى علاقتين قانونيتين وأساسيتين للمحكمة الجنائية الدولية وهما العلاقة مع المحاكم الوطنية و الاختصاص التكميلي للمحاكم الوطنية.

الملخص الإنجليزي

The International Criminal Court (ICC) follows international criminal trials in the form of temporary international criminal justice (international military tribunals - special international criminal tribunals) and the fact that the International Criminal Court is permanent and reverses its precedents - The limited international crimes in the Rome Statute were not a priority jurisdiction, such as temporary international criminal justice, but rather a complementary jurisdiction, namely the priority of national jurisdiction at the expense of the International Criminal Court, in application of the principle of complementarity.

International Criminal Court.

However, this principle, which is subject to the International Criminal Court in the jurisdiction of the subject of some questions, including: the content of the content, the limits of application, and perhaps the second point - the limits of application - is the task in all this and the answer to other questions, but to address the limits of the application of the principle of complementarity Would be possible only by bringing the matter back to the two basic legal relationships of the International Criminal Court, namely the relationship with national courts and the complementary jurisdiction of national courts.

It is therefore clear that the question of the limits of application of the principle of complementarity is linked to the relations of the International Criminal Court and the national courts.

In summary, the Court is an unlimited development in the field of international criminal justice as it is competent to try and punish the perpetrators of serious international crimes that threaten world peace and security.

Its Statute came to put an end to the impunity of the perpetrators of these serious crimes, which could also lead to the prevention of such crimes in the future.

The practical experience of the Tribunal will remain the only future in order to demonstrate the effectiveness of its jurisdiction.

The International Court of Justice and other criminal tribunals, which constitute a judicial organ but constitute an international judicial body that seeks international justice by ensuring respect for human rights and international values within international relations, and the existence of such a judicial system may help vulnerable States To provide a measure of peace and security in light of the growing crime and arrogance of some superpowers in a time of globalization and the international community to support this idea and seek to expand the powers of the International Criminal Court to impose its control and expand its competence to include States as well as persons as a capable jurist Li commit the most heinous crimes.

The International Criminal Court (ICC) has established, under international treaties and international treaties, the nature of the State's full freedom to accede to it, but it is permanent and does not end with the termination of the treaty.

Its jurisdiction becomes automatic unless the State appreciates or wishes to conduct the trial in the terms of reference of the International Criminal Court Which is provided for in article 17, and although it is not a judicial authority over States and not an alternative to national criminal courts.

In the opinion of the researcher that the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court substantive and issued by the Commission on the investigation of war crimes, which was founded by the Allies were politicized and unfair to some of the defeated countries such as Turkey, which was accused of the crime of genocide of Armenians 1915.

Turning to the cases of the International Criminal Court in the jurisdiction The National Criminal Courts, which are derived from article 17 of the Rome Statute, are four cases: 1.

If the investigation or prosecution is conducted by a State with jurisdiction over it unless the State is unwilling to carry out the investigation, that.

2.

If the investigation has been conducted by a State which has jurisdiction over it and decides not to prosecute the person concerned unless the decision is the result of the State's unwillingness or inability to prosecute.

3.

If the person concerned has already been prosecuted for the conduct of the complaint and the court may not prosecute him in accordance with article 20, paragraph (3).

We note that the purpose of studying the relationship between the international criminal courts and the national criminal court is the principle of complementarity between the International Criminal Court And the national courts, which will find the settlement of disputes arising from the overlap of jurisdiction between them, is consistent with the general principles of international law provided for in the general principles of the settlement of thorny disputes.

التخصصات الرئيسية

القانون

الموضوعات

• المحاكم
• المحاكم الدولية
• المحكمة الجنائية الدولية

عدد الصفحات

130

قائمة المحتويات

• APA
• MLA
• AMA

لغة النص

العربية

نوع البيانات

رسائل جامعية

رقم السجل

BIM-836346