مكانة القوة في المدرك الاستراتيجي الأمريكي : دراسة في التأصيل النظري و التوظيف الاستراتيجي

الملخص EN

The link between the dialectic of what is and what should be in relation to the status of power in the American strategic perception and the problem of employing it is one of the deep-seated mental syndromes in American strategic thinking, especially after the events of September 11, 2001 and the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Alternatives or effective means that enhance the outcomes of the US strategic performance in the final outcome on the side of the bloc of comprehensive strategic capabilities and balance in the use of force, leading to continuity of American hegemony according to the formulation of a new geostrategic philosophy The concepts of soft power and hard power have been expressed as vocabulary in the so-called balanced recruitment of power under the name of smart power to achieve the objectives of the American strategy.

, As it provides an analytical view of the impact of the use of smart power in the US strategy and modernity in the use of patterns of international interactions, and shows us the nature of the relationship between the soft and solid strength and calculations of US decision makers on the handling of international units and non The international component of the new world order, which distinguishes the American strategic thinking from others that it has dimensions and dynamics and dynamics and high dynamic, and never neglect the future dimension and its future prospects.

Perhaps one of the most difficult tasks that can be understood through the interactions of power in the totality of its current and future variables lies in building new thinking and crystallizing the mutual strategic perception of what is the nature of the global interactions, both international and regional, so this research is an attempt to predict the future of power in strategic perception and strategic employment accounts And then approach the potential data of the next time based on knowledge of what is going on today.

Therefore, there must be basic prerequisites for understanding the significance of the present and the future, which are first and foremost the understanding of today's intellectual theories and a very important process that can never be ignored or overlooked or underestimated the consequences.

The international variables that have influenced the structure of the international system have played an important and influential role in changing the concept of power and shaping new patterns.

This has made the traditional concept of solid power significantly less than the new power of soft power as one of the new forms of force employed by the United States of America The use of the concept of power has been the most important strategic constellation in external political performance since the founding of the United States of America to the present day, and that changes in the function of US power go beyond setting priorities and approaches to strategic implementation tools Regardless of its primary function in protecting the interests of the United States of America, whether tactics or images employed in the framework of conventional or nuclear deterrence or preemptive or preventive war or to attract and influence the behavior of others by employing soft power or pairing between hard and soft power under the so-called The force is a general and comprehensive concept based on a range of political, economic, military, cultural and human factors that affect each other, that is, the use of active and constructive force in the American strategic mind as a mechanism of implementation Therefore, the methods of analysis of international relations have always discussed the problem of the use of force as the main engine of the interactions among countries.

The understanding of the status of the force, its components, its elements, and the mechanisms of its strategy varies Schools, approaches and different theoretical trends in international relations, as well as the nature of the orientations of the US strategic decision maker.