مسؤولية الدول عن دعم المجموعات المسلحة في ضوء معيار السيطرة الفعالة

الملخص EN

The present century has seen remarkable increase number of international and non-international armed conflicts, accompanied by a clear external support has led to serious violations of international humanitarian law, although international community attempted over decades to determine the General principles of international responsibility, it did not amount to the extent that he arguably incomplete and unclear link between Dole supported armed groups and the resulting gross violations International Court of Justice has been on several occasions to the subject, especially in military and paramilitary activities in and against Nicaragua, 1986 and the issue of genocide in Bosnia in 2007, but each case diligently and separate opinion based on the criterion of effective control The relationship remained unclear in the international responsibility arising from supporting armed groups, is accused of committing serious violations of international humanitarian law, as indeed proved two things, the first steady increase of non-international armed conflicts, the second with the increasing support received by the parties to this dispute in the glare of the international community, without concrete action to stand up to this international problem and humanity The harsh realities of the world today in the shadow of armed conflicts raging as in Libya, Syria and Iraq and led by non-State armed groups, leads us to search for the position of general international law the responsibility of supporting these groups and submitted to justice, especially international issues threw Western spittle to professionals in public international law, already mentioned above, only to return again to highlight the latest contemporary issues that stand on a central point in our study, is how to prove the relationship Among the armed groups and supportive countries Problematic study Looking for answers to study specific problems: if it was easy to prove the responsibility of military commanders return to their nationality to a predetermined State, this is not so for those who commit serious violations at the same time do not qualify as dependents of a State.

And problems that are going to look, how international law subject, are the responsibility of the State for the project contributed to the mistakes of 2001, bridging the gap that characterized public international law, in other words are filling the legal vacuum that young people organize international responsibility for more than four decades ago? Why the international community about the adoption of an International Convention governing the responsibility of States to support armed groups committed serious violations? No chapter on liability and dispersed, isn't responsible States depending on the responsibility of armed groups committed serious violations and vice versa? What is the standard of effective control, how it originated and what components it? And finally you can help standard of effective control in proving responsibility of States supporting armed and loaded the consequences of violations committed against civilians in parts of the world in General and in Libya, Syria and Iraq.