مفهوم السرقة العلمية حسب القرار 933 و الأشخاص المعنيين بتطبيقه

الملخص EN

Each university community is supposed to be a society that embraces the elite, the elite of the society, and the pioneers possesses academic honesty and values, because they are a group of bright minds, originally they recognize the efforts of the others, but due to the spread of corruption as a across borders phenomenon, touching various sectors of the state, Which led to the emergence of so-called plagiarism, despite the creation of the Professional Ethics Council under Act No.

99_05 of 04 April 1999, related to the proposal for measures on the rules of manners and ethics in the university, as well as their respect.

However, the outbreak of plagiarism in its various forms, especially in recent times and in a terrible manner, resulted in the issuance of Ministerial decision No.

933 of July 28, 2016, an attempt to address this type of phenomena.

It included 39 articles, including the general provisions, in addition to an attempt to control the concept of plagiarism, , And to provide for a range of prevention and sensitization measures, as well as follow-up action, where both to the professors and to the student subject to plagiarism.

The problematic: How did the decision define plagiarism? And what are its forms and manners? What are the categories to which the resolution applies?