الفروق في أنماط معالجة المعلومات لدى التلاميذ المتفوقين دراسيا : دراسة ميدانية مقارنة بين تلاميذ مناهج الجيل الأول و تلاميذ مناهج الجيل الثاني ببعض المدارس الابتدائية بولاية المسيلة

الملخص EN

The purpose of this study is to identify the differences in information processing patterns of both first generation methods students and pupils of second generation platforms excelling academically in some primary schools in M's Ha, uncover more information processing styles common in all of the first generation methods students and pupils The second generation platforms excelling academically, by answering the following questions : • There are differences in information processing styles (Left style, Right style, Integrated style) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation curriculum gifted curriculum ? • Is there a statistically significant differences in the pattern of concurrent processing (Left style) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation curriculum gifted curriculum ? • Is there a statistically significant differences in the pattern of concurrent processingj (Right style) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation curriculum gifted curriculum? • Is there a statistically significant differences in the pattern of concurrent processing (Integrated style) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation curriculum gifted curriculum? the study was conducted on a sample of (30) pupils and pupil were chosen groupsp and testing Hypotheses of the study information processing styles scale was applied, making sure the psychometric properties, and during this study used a/bahathtan a comparative descriptive squatting a/bahathtan was also used in the statistical treatment of statistical software (spss20), with statistical techniques including: Arithmetic averages, standard deviations, test (t-test).

the study was yielded the following results : • Feature differences in information processing styles (Left style, Right style, Integrated style) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation platforms excelling academically.

• There are statistically significant differences in the pattern of successive treatment (Left style ) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation platforms excelling academically.

• There are statistically significant differences in the pattern of successive CRight style) treatment among pupils of first generation platforms and second generation methods students excelling academically.

• The lack of statistically significant differences in the pattern of composite processing (Integrated style) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation platforms excelling academically.

The study yielded the following results: • Feature differences in information processing styles (Left style, Right style, Integrated style) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation platforms excelling academically.

• There are statistically significant differences in the pattern of successive treatment (Left style ) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation platforms excelling academically.

• There are statistically significant differences in the pattern of successive ("Right style) treatment among pupils of first generation platforms and second generation methods students excelling academically.

• The lack of statistically significant differences in the pattern of composite processing (Integrated style) between the first generation methods students and disciples of the second generation platforms excelling academically.

In the latter study recommended: • tracer studies patterns ofprocess information across educational levels to determine the pattern in each stage.

• Other studies on pupils ' information processing styles through using other metrics, as standard 'Herman '(Herrmann), and measuring the compatibility between it and the standard used in the current study to categorize students by controlling control style.

• other researchers studies on patterns of information processing at the top students in primary school, and the subject was raised for the first time to discover the differences between the two studies to reach the same results or skewness.