مصطلح "التداولية" في الدراسات العربية المعاصرة بين التلقي و التأسيس : قراءة تحليلية نقدية

الملخص EN

"Searle By looking at the present situation of the Arabic pragmatic studies, we can see that it was able to be delimited within a special scientific frame, this can be seen in the writings which defined this domain, its nature and fields, and thus trying to profit from its analysis of the linguistic discourse genres.

We are going to deal -in the light of this communication- with the reception of "the term pragmatic" in modern Arabic studies; if we deal with it in the light of the methodology of putting scientific concepts which were emphasized by Arabic standard institutions, we can make a lot of remarks in which we show that there are a lot of concepts in this specific m translations that did not respect the norms of derivational terminological ا scientific field which have proposed to the methodology, and the problematic of the term "pragmatics" itself has justified this where there were a lot of proposed translations that did not match to the nature of this science.

Todiscuss these issues of this problematic, first we are going to define the scientific term and the methodology of putting it, then we are going to present an analyticcritic description of a set of pragmatic terms tackled by modern Arabic scholars where they did not respect the norms of putting standard characteristics of Arabic scientific terms by taking into consideration Concept and State.

This study is supported by a lot of translations of some important books in Pragmatics, like the books of Austin and his student Searle.