الصواب و الإلزام عند "روس

الملخص EN

Right and binding are important concepts in the field of ethical philosophy, and the meaning of each one may become one meaning in some philosophers’ point view or very close to one another.

And we addressed this subject in detail, : a) Ross’s presentation of the meaning of Right and Binding.

b) Indicate that his handling of this subject contributed to the development of the doctrine of duty and the doctrine of intuition.

c) Explain what Ross may have overlooked when presenting his prima face duties.

Ross discusses the meaning of Right and begins to address the evolutionary view.it is acceptable to deal with this school as a whole, although it has in fact confined itself to one of the definitions of ethical terms.

But sometimes refer to the definition of Right by refence to the desirability of society, and sometimes tend to define the right as an evolving behavior.

The evolutionary and psychological school has made it very clear that there is little awareness of the distinction between two completely different question.

The first is the meaning of terms such as “right” or “obligatory”, What do we say about describing behavior when it is identified as “right” or ” binding”? what are the other characteristics of describing behavior as “right” or “binding”? the way this school usually follows is to review a variety of types of action commonly called right and binding.

However, it is clear that the assumption of revision of the examples will be sufficient and that the discovery of the common characteristics will be correct.

There will be two possibilities: first, that the common traits that have been discovered may be the right ones, and second : is in itself different from the right (right character) is not the essence of right but the basis of it.