الآثار الواردة عن عائشة بن الصديق رضي الله عنه التي توهم الطعن في رسم المصحف

الملخص EN

Subject of research: This research deals with the study and analysis of the narratives contained Aisha, on surface, deludes the writings of the Quran.

The researcher wanted to achieve the following objectives: -Inventory of narratives from Aisha god bless her questioning the writings of Quran -Statement of authenticity or weakness -Answer to the ones with issues -A statement that there is no appeal against the doctrine of Muslims toward the authenticity of the Quranic text.

-Understanding the position of Scholars with these effects, discussing them and concluding the most correct opinion.

Research Methodology: The researcher in his research walked the following path: survey of all of the Aisha god bless her narratives, the inductive analysis of them, judging them in terms of “Sanad” and “Matn” and reading the views of Scholars towards it.

The researcher concluded the following results: 1- Explicit narratives referenced to Aisha god bless her which question the writings of the Koran are very limited and not more than five narratives.

2- inumber of verses on this narratives are six verses .

3 - Not all of the narratives which claimed that Aisha god bless her questions the writing of the Quran are accurate.

The researcher believe only two of them are most likely correct.

4 - There is no proof that Aisha god bless her marks Zaid Ibn Thabit in error.

What was reported was faulting the writer.

This word can have several meanings.

5- the resavc her explainecl that all what is stated can be directecl including the effect of weak.

6 - The researcher demonstrated that even with the assumption of the imposition of the will of Aisha god bless her on Zaid Ibn Thabit this does not detract from the integrity of the Quranic text.

The researcher recommends the following: 1.

Expand research in this topic to include what was reported by companions “Sahabah” and followers.

2-Principal Investigator should not rely on some of the responses received to the effects of this subject.

The majority are subject to debate and research.

The investigator should reconsider these responses.

3-Principal Investigator should not have his goal of the research to respond to suspicions of these individuals of the authenticity of Quran text.

Such objective will derail his search.

4-Who stands up to discuss this matter must consider it from both accuracy and meaning.

The omission of one of the two will not yield to the proper resul