مقاربات منهجية في العلوم الإنسانية : منهج الفهم عند دلتاي نموذجا

الملخص EN

The humanities are among the most modern sciences and their growth, development and prosperity have been a natural response to the aspirations of the societies in which they emerged to solve their problems and crises.

This is the case of all the sciences of the history of human civilizations: they do not develop, they do not grow and develop, except in a social and cultural context that binds them, supports them and replaces them with a intellectual leadership.

Epistemological problems related to the breadth of scientific studies and the methodological methodology to be adopted in the social sciences and humanities can be formulated in a number of fundamental questions, notably: Does the study of the human sciences meet the specifications of the sciences? Natural? Can the human sciences access scientific knowledge by adopting the scientific method adopted in the natural sciences? Are human phenomena susceptible of interpretation or understanding? These issues have given rise to different and contradictory points of view, including the defense of positive experimental approach as a necessary method for ensuring scientific studies of humanity, including the defense of understanding as a method.

appropriate for these studies, and one of the most prominent advocates of this approach, the German philosopher (Wilhelm Dilthey): What is his vision of the humanities? How can this approach be applied to the study of the human phenomenon? Can this approach give a scientific dimension to human study?