الخطأ في تقدير الدليل : دراسة قانونية في إطار أدلة الإثبات في الدعوى الجزائية

الملخص EN

The criminal judgment is the title of the truth, both in the facts and the results of the evidence, if it is an argument against the other judgments.

In order to achieve this goal, the criminal judge grants broader powers than other judges in various fields, including the assessment of evidence.

The researcher discussed in this study the concept of the authority of the judge to assess evidence in order to be able to take note of the subject of the study.

And his knowledge, the power of this study has also highlighted the authority The criminal judge in various criminal systems, including the Iraqi criminal system in the light of the Code of Criminal Procedure No.

23 of 1971, as highlighted in this study on the basis of the assessment of evidence and its limitations as we find that the original in olute power has placed the exception on the original, as the study showed The subject of research after the error estimation of the evidence, explaining that through the tariff, and subjective error, this time the study reached the most important results, including the judge's discretion extends all stages of the proceedings and all types of criminal courts.