تأويل الدلالات الضمنية بين الدرس التداولي و البلاغة العربية

الملخص EN

In their talks about implicit connotations, linguists said that the speaker does not mention all details in his speech.

So, they started searching the methods by which the implicit connotations through a speech can be explored and interpreted.

And by searching the efforts of linguists in this field, we found out that the interpretation of implicit connotations has been developed in three phases as follows : The first phase, in which the truth and sincerity of words are explored, appeared with the early linguists such as J.

Austin (1962) and J.

Searle (1969).

While the second phase, which is mainly represented by O.

Ducrot (1972) and P.

Grice (1975), seemed more flexible in dealing with the implicit connotation, as they substituted the logic method by the idea of contexts.

Whilst the last phase, which is represented by D.

Sperber and D.

Wilson (1980), is of an epistemological trait reflecting a major development of the interpretation of the implicit connotations, as the achievements of the epistemological psychology has been involved.

After the talking about the origin of pragmatics (The European one) of interpreting the implicit connotation, we are going to identify the intentions of the implicit connotation in the Arab rhetorical heritage.

Then, we are going to discuss the methods of the Arab rhetoricians, which they used in their interpretations, after explaining the similarity between the Arabic concept of interpretation and the European one.

Consequently, it is found that the most distinguished methods by which rhetoricians interpreted the implicit connotations were the grammatical and rhetorical deduction method, language utilization method, and satisfaction method.