التفاوت الجغرافي لمستويات التنمية البشرية في العالم

الملخص EN

The research focused on the geographic disparity of the levels of human development in the world.

It aims to know the geographic disparity of human development, and the relationship between its levels.

In addition, it seeks to measure the impact of the very high Human Development Index (HDI) on the levels of other human development, by adopting the historical, descriptive, analytical, and the deductive approach.

The research used the statistical Package for the Social Sciences (Spss) program in the presentation and analysis of data.

Among the most important findings is that there are four levels of human development in the world , including countries of high human development , very high , medium, and low.

The highest evidence of very high human development Index is (0.955) in the State of Norway and the lowest is ( 0.805 ) in Croatia , and the highest evidence of high human development Index is ( 0.796 ) in Bahrain and the lowest is ( 0.712 ) in Tunisia , and the highest medium human development index is ( 0.71 ) in Tonga and the lowest is ( 0.53) in the Lao People's Democratic , Bhutan , and Swaziland , while the highest evidence of low human development index is ( 0.53) in the State of Congo, and Solomon Islands , and the lowest is ( 0.30 ) in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Niger.

Further, there is no relationship between the per capita income in the countries of high human development, very high, medium, and low index.

However, there is a fully extrusive and substantial correlation between the very high HDI, high , medium, and low in the world.

The thing that influenced the high levels of human development on the very high levels of human development by 94.1 % and by 96% in the medium and in the low rate by 97.8.

%.

Among the most important recommendations is to establish Ministries of human development in the countries with medium and low human development index.

Concerning the development of human resources, there should be an investment in human capital in urban and rural areas.

Besides, the study recommends providing education, health, in addition to increasing the per capita income of the gross national production, and creating alternative sources of income to improve the standards of living in the economic, social, political and environmental fields.