الأحكام الفقهية لجرائم القذف و السب و التشهير عبر شبكات التواصل الاجتماعي : دراسة فقهية مقارنة

الملخص EN

Praise be to Allah, Lord of the Worlds, and peace and blessings be upon the envoy, a mercy to the worlds of our master Muhammad and his family and companions.

After
It is no secret to the foresight of the greatness of the Sharia of Islam; that it orbed all incidents no matter how new, and issues no matter how serious, through its rules and general principles, and guides that control the new things, and the provisions of the text or deduction, there is nothing of the acts of the taxpayer except It has a rule in this blessed law.

Crimes through a variety of means, such as libel, insult, cursing, and defamation, have spread widely through websites by tossing, cursing, or throwing at others.

The problem of defamation and insult and electronic defamation is growing rapidly and dangerous, because it will be seen by a very large number of people, and in return hide the perpetrator of this defamation and defamation behind fake names, and the difficulty of reaching the real person, and then hold him accountable for his actions.

The research problem is summarized in the jurisprudence of defamation, insults and defamation through social media, and the position of Egyptian law and the Saudi regime on these crimes.

This research consisted of an introduction and five topics: the first topic: the concept of libel crimes, insults and defamation through social media in the Islamic jurisprudence and the Saudi system, and the second topic: the motives of libel crimes, insults and defamation through social media and its pillars in Islamic jurisprudence and Egyptian law and the Saudi system, and the third topic: Legitimacy of Defamation, Defamation, and Defamation in Islamic Jurisprudence through Social Media Networks, and the Fourth Topic: The Penalty of Defamation, Defamation, and Defamation through Social Media in Islamic Jurisprudence, Egyptian Law and the Saudi System.

Account for crimes of libel, insult and defamation through social media in Islamic jurisprudence, Egyptian law and the Saudi regime
Conclusion: It includes the most important findings reached in the research and then appended the research index of the most important references and sources.

Keywords: Jurisprudence Judgments, Defamation Crimes, Defamation Crimes, Defamation Crimes, Social Networks, Comparative Jurisprudence Study.

 
 
Dr.

Murtaza Abdul Rahim Mohammed Abdul Rahim
Head of the Department of Humanities and Associate Professor of Comparative Jurisprudence at the University College of Bernieh, Taif University
Assistant Professor of Comparative Jurisprudence, Faculty of Islamic and Arabic Studies for Girls, Sohag, Al-Azhar University
Email: Mortada_321@yahoo.

com