المعارضة و الترجيح

الملخص EN

The objective of this research is to identify the concept of opposition and weighting.

It is presented in three sections.

The first topic dealt with the concept of opposition and weighting, the discrepancy between the text and the measurement and the evidence thereof, and what the fundamentalists required to achieve the contradiction, and the ruling of the opposition if the discrepancy between two or two years, The question of whether the halal and haram meet, and the fundamentalists, and the sayings of the fundamentalists if one of the narratives contradicts one of them, one of which is proven and the other negating which one is offering, and the ways in which the copyist is known to be from the abrogated one.

The second is to deal with the weighting and the opinion of the fundamentalists on the weighting of the strongest cause.

At least, the majority is likely to be the same.

The majority is likely to be at least acceptable, and the presumption of steadfastness depends on the rule.

Not reflected.

And the third topic: dealing with corrupt and corrupt, including the predominance of the likes; the weight of the lack of descriptions, and the weight of the few parts, and the weight of many narrators.

Researcher
Abdullah bin Humaid bin Mabrik Zinbaki
Specialization of jurisprudence from
the Department of Sharia and Islamic Studies
Faculty of Arts & Humanities - King Abdulaziz University