التسامح ركيزة استراتيجية لتشكيل السلام بين الأديان

Abstract EN

The research is an address and the concepts involved.

It focuses on answering the main question: Can tolerance bring about a breakthrough in interfaith dialogue and peace-building in the religious world that is aggravated by the transformation of crises, conflicts and conflicts and religious intolerance? The debate between tolerance and dialogue, on the one hand, and contempt and intolerance on the other, has become controversial.

It is clear that it is framed within the framework of tolerance, specifically within the concept of dialogue.

It also highlights the approach of intolerance and contempt.

The moderation and moderation of religious discourse is meant to promote tolerance and moderation of religious discourse, which puts us in front of a range of dilemmas that lie ahead of the dialectic of tolerance / intolerance: how to spread the language of tolerance in light of the prevalence of intolerance and religious disrespect? To what extent can the moderation and permissibility of religious discourse to promote peace be considered an applicable approach? To approach the problem that surrounds the question posed tolerance / disdain / dialogue / clash, it is necessary to decide who is the most common and who is legitimately codified and who is customary with clarifying and obfuscating the established concepts of the quality of the relationship between religions and whether they are authorized or implicated one? The tolerant nature of this dialectic of tolerance / disdain requires two possible answers: First: Tolerance and contempt are two complementary concepts and their existence is a normal, positive and second: the emergence of tolerance is contemptuous and the contempt is tolerant.

Their relationship is counterproductive, but the paradox is that tolerance leads to peace-building, and disrespect leads to the construction of religious conflict.

The more religious and moral values are tolerated, the more sanctified and the religious symbols become; the greater the religious intolerance and disdain; the more interreligious dialogue was; the more peaceful the peace is, the more it is possible to focus on the thesis of tolerance we find More acceptance of the theocratic peace advocates; being legitimized and codified, in order to solve the problem, we used the descriptive-analytical approach, which focuses on describing and analyzing the experiences raised by the research topic, addressing its role in achieving interfaith dialogue through "the transmission of religious discourse" and” Violations of human rights and peace.