البحث الميداني في الدراسات السوسيوسياسية و إشكالية الحذر في مجتمع الخوف

Abstract EN

The field work is considered the main step in any social study.

It get out of a circle of non-scientific and make us move away from value judgments and philosophical predictions.

Therefore, the empirical studies today are regarded as the cornerstone of any social research since the field and communication with the research population and the collection of information from the social battlefield is the closest way to understanding the human phenomenon of great complexity, but the privacy of the society and the extent of its involvement in modernity have a great effectiveness on the success of these field studies, especially with regard to socio-political research and in our societies that are suffering from fear and repression.

In fact, the connection between the idea of the question about the political orientation and the idea of the detective and the security agent is the population deals with the researcher cautiously, and often refuses to deal with him or make false statements about his political position and this affected the quality of social research and the extent of conformity to quality standards.

In their view, they do not reflect facts as much as they reflect interfaces, and this is what we will try to address in this paper