أركو لوجيا فلسفة التاريخ بين المثالية و المادية

Abstract EN

In perceptions of history Alhegelah history is no longer a vague or unreasonable in reality.

But it is a form of mind, higher than the form of analytical understanding.

According to him, as cited by George Spine "The real is mental.

The mental is real," but he went to more than that, in that all the epochs of both an integral part.

And that its operations and events are interrelated.

Although it has a prima facie logically different.

However this.

Hegel believed that the "historical necessity" stems from the fact that the effective date and reasons, not personal powers, but not the individual people or individual events.

As Marx was proud of all the pride that he "took the logic of Hegel's dialectic, then (his heart upside down) but it was not meant to precisely this, and you are to find that the logic of controversy when Hegel starts thinking, then moves to the nature and ends with reason, and Marx did not reflect this situation.

he pointed to the first binomial and only the second (of thought and nature), not the third, and inadvertently, but the logic of Hegel in the controversy began thinking Turning to nature, either dialectical logic has begun to nature and moved to thought.

It was not Marx pole poles ignorance of philosophy, not a moment is supposed one that the primacy of thought on the nature in the eyes of Hegel, means that he might think the nature of the production of the mind.

he knew that Hegel is no different with him to look at the mind that it is nature produce production.

based on the original to the logic of the argument .

He was aware of the thought that the word in the sense that he meant Hegel once defined as the science of logic thinking does not go off to the person who thinks, but go off the topic that riveted him thinking .