المعضلة المعيارية في فهم الخطابات الأمنية : مقاربة جيف هويسمانس و فولفانغ إيزر

Abstract EN

The study relies mainly on the approach of Jef Huysmans and Wolfgang Iser to highlight the normative dilemma in writing and speaking security, given that the Copenhagen School defined security as a speech act, which is the ability of a security actor to speak security successfully, and therefore security does not refer to an objective thing Or material - tangible, but has become self-referential established in the believer actor, thus the understanding provided for security Ttalatani in essence rather than objective.

Here the normative dilemma lies in the production of what one tries to avoid and criticize (a security vulnerability), and the reason for the occurrence of the normative dilemma lies in the perception of the relationship between language and security, as the study argues that the process of security cannot be based solely on rhetorical practice.