الحجاج و الجدل و المناظرة : أوجه التشابه و الاختلاف

Abstract EN

This study is rotated in the pragmatic linguistic orbit through looking for the relations between the terms "argumentation, debate and controversy" in order to identify the main points of agreement and the differences between them according to their concepts, and according to their mentioned in the holy Quran, and based on the studies presented by the old and modern scholars.

The research concludes that these terms fall into a single crucible, although there are differences between them, but they converge and intersect as a rhetorical forms full of mechanisms that used by the interlocutors, and is the core of the attention of contemporary argumentative theory, which cares about everything related to influence and persuasion.