دور الأنشطة الاتصالية للعلاقات العامة بمؤسسات الدولة في توعية الشباب الجامعي بمواجهة الإرهاب

Abstract EN

The study aimed to identify the role of communication activities for public relations in state institutions in educating university youth to confront terrorism.

this study is a descriptive study and uses the sample media survey method, which was applied during the years (2019-2021).

the study used data collection tools (questionnaire) on a sample of 60 specialists in the field of public relations, and on a sample of university youth consisting of 400 young people.

university, the researcher used a scale to monitor the attitudes of university youth towards the role of communication activities in confronting terrorism.

the study reached the following results there are no statistically significant differences between the average scores of males and the average scores of females in their attitudes towards the role of communication activities for public relations in the institutions they frequent in raising awareness of confronting terrorism, where the value of “T” reached 1.644, which is a value that is not statistically significant at the level of significance, there are statistically significant differences between the average scores of university youth in their attitudes towards the role of communication activities for public relations in raising awareness of confronting terrorism according to the university (al-Azhar-Ain shams-October 6) on the trends scale, where the value of (P) 4.152 functioned at 0.001.

the differences were in favor of the youth of Ain shams university when compared with the two universities, al-Azhar and 6 October, and differences were in favor of the youth of al-Azhar university when compared with the students of 6 October university, and there are statistically significant differences between the levels of social and economic university youth groups in their attitudes towards communicative activities, where the value of (P) 5.043 was at 0.001, according to the difference in the socioeconomic level (high-medium-low).