الرواة الذين أخرج الشيخان حديثهم في صحيحهما من أصحاب الفرق بين معايير الحديثية و التسامح المذهبي

Abstract EN

In this research paper which deals with the studying and analysis of legal criteria of the saying of prophet Mohammed 'pbuh'.

"Hadith", which are narrated by different sects.

These criteria are as follows: the narrator should be honest, recall it verbatim, and he should not narrate the Hadith, which support his sect.

Any additional thing beyond the mentioned criteria is invalid.

It was noticed that the same criteria are applied to the "Ahl alsun- nah" narrators.

It was observed from the study that seventy narrators who belongs to different sects such as Al-Murj'a, Al-Nasiba, Al-Ibadhia, Al-Raphida, Al-Waqifa were authenticated by processed in the reference books.

Talking of honesty as the place of dissention, i.e., whether to accept the narration of the scholars of those sects.

We have to discern that the honesty is included in them and above all they should be Muslim, adult, mentally we and right doers.

The dispute around the acceptance of the saying is based on question whether they are believers or unbelievers.

The policy of the Hadith's scholars was unequivocal as they put a decisive decision to consider their narration since they are not unbelievers and their wrongdoing is unwillingly based on their wrong judgement.

So first they are not excommunicated and did not commit sin, which is beyond doubt, a sin in Islam and their honesty is granted if they are in accordance with the criteria.

So long as the scholars accepted their narration it is a decree for the that they are beyond doubt honest and fair.

We notice from authentication of Hadith which is taken from the Quaran and the practice of prophet Mohammed 'pbuh' which further translated into legal behavior by the scholars of Hadith and this is built over forgiveness which is a part of our Islamic creed that deal with such cases.