Peer review as a scheme of evaluating faculty performance : a critical perspective
العناوين الأخرى
تقييم الاقران بوصفها طريقة لمراجعة أداء أعضاء هيئة التدريس : دراسة نقدية
المؤلف
al-Samir, Muhammad Ahmad Abd al-Sattar
المصدر
العدد
المجلد 2013، العدد 65 (30 يونيو/حزيران 2013)، ص ص. 43-72، 30ص.
الناشر
تاريخ النشر
2013-06-30
دولة النشر
العراق
عدد الصفحات
30
التخصصات الرئيسية
الموضوعات
الملخص AR
This paper is a critical review of faculty peer evaluation (FPE) scheme adopted by a private higher education institution (PHEI) in Oman.
The purpose is to identify the points of weakness in this scheme, and then to propose an alternative model of peer evaluation (PE).
This model is built on the discrepancies routed in the available version of (PE), and on the different ideas proposed by scholars interested in quality assurance and faculty performance evaluation.
The whole process of faculty evaluation at the (PHEI) is reviewed with due emphasis on the analysis of (FPE).
Relevant literature has been surveyed where the methodology adopted, and the findings are highlighted.
The points of drawbacks elicited in the current model are: (i) it is a one-dimensional version constructed on rating scale only with a complete ignorance to the criteria on which evaluation is based, (ii) it shows low degree of coverage since many important areas relevant to teaching quality are neglected, (iii) questionnaire items are inadequately and improperly arranged, and (iv) the rating resulted from this model is of a high degree of subjectivity.
The suggested version is characterized by the following: (i) it is more comprehensive where five major areas relevant to faculty performance are covered; teaching, research, institution service, adherence to bylaws and regulations, and contribution to community service, (ii) It is evidence-based in that the response scale is governed by the evaluator's knowledge of the item being responded to, (iii) it is a multi-functional version since it can be used for formative, summative, and other types of faculty evaluation, (iv) it
الملخص EN
This paper is a critical review of faculty peer evaluation (FPE) scheme adopted by a private higher education institution (PHEI) in Oman.
The purpose is to identify the points of weakness in this scheme, and then to propose an alternative model of peer evaluation (PE).
This model is built on the discrepancies routed in the available version of (PE), and on the different ideas proposed by scholars interested in quality assurance and faculty performance evaluation.
The whole process of faculty evaluation at the (PHEI) is reviewed with due emphasis on the analysis of (FPE).
Relevant literature has been surveyed where the methodology adopted, and the findings are highlighted.
The points of drawbacks elicited in the current model are : (i) it is a one-dimensional version constructed on rating scale only with a complete ignorance to the criteria on which evaluation is based, (ii) it shows low degree of coverage since many important areas relevant to teaching quality are neglected, (iii) questionnaire items are inadequately and improperly arranged, and (iv) the rating resulted from this model is of a high degree of subjectivity.
The suggested version is characterized by the following : (i) it is more comprehensive where five major areas relevant to faculty performance are covered ; teaching, research, institution service, adherence to bylaws and regulations, and contribution to community service, (ii) It is evidence-based in that the response scale is governed by the evaluator's knowledge of the item being responded to, (iii) it is a multi-functional version since it can be used for formative, summative, and other types of faculty evaluation, (iv) it.
نمط استشهاد جمعية علماء النفس الأمريكية (APA)
al-Samir, Muhammad Ahmad Abd al-Sattar. 2013. Peer review as a scheme of evaluating faculty performance : a critical perspective. Adab al-Basrah،Vol. 2013, no. 65, pp.43-72.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-343008
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الأمريكية للغات الحديثة (MLA)
al-Samir, Muhammad Ahmad Abd al-Sattar. Peer review as a scheme of evaluating faculty performance : a critical perspective. Adab al-Basrah No. 65 (2013), pp.43-72.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-343008
نمط استشهاد الجمعية الطبية الأمريكية (AMA)
al-Samir, Muhammad Ahmad Abd al-Sattar. Peer review as a scheme of evaluating faculty performance : a critical perspective. Adab al-Basrah. 2013. Vol. 2013, no. 65, pp.43-72.
https://search.emarefa.net/detail/BIM-343008
نوع البيانات
مقالات
لغة النص
الإنجليزية
الملاحظات
Includes appendix : p. 65-72
رقم السجل
BIM-343008
قاعدة معامل التأثير والاستشهادات المرجعية العربي "ارسيف Arcif"
أضخم قاعدة بيانات عربية للاستشهادات المرجعية للمجلات العلمية المحكمة الصادرة في العالم العربي
تقوم هذه الخدمة بالتحقق من التشابه أو الانتحال في الأبحاث والمقالات العلمية والأطروحات الجامعية والكتب والأبحاث باللغة العربية، وتحديد درجة التشابه أو أصالة الأعمال البحثية وحماية ملكيتها الفكرية. تعرف اكثر