دراسة مقارنة : إباحة قذف الموظف أو من في حكمه

Abstract EN

Given the seriousness and importance of the work performed by the employee or the equivalents in the community, it has been subjected comparative legislation that works for multiple images of control, including the control of the People, which permits citizens to control the acts of employees or the like and detect defects and shortcomings which riddled and deviations which commit occasion they do their business and that was affecting their honor or considered by the recognition of the right to challenge the work of the employee or the like, or the so-called French jurisprudence (le exception veritatis) .

Since the right of appeal in the work of the employee or the like may involve the implications of intervention under the description of the crimes of libel and insult, they admit comparative legislation to legalize the use of the right to appeal if there is objective conditions to be observed by granting the accused the right to validate the facts of defamation through the payment by the fact that lead to the legalization of libel actions against the employee or the equivalents.

On the basis of the above, specialized research study to ensure the defence of truth and its impact on the legalization of throwing the employee and the like according to a method analytical comparison, was divided research into two sections, taking the first section of what the right to challenge in the work of the employee or the like, while specialize second topic statement guarantee of the defence of truth, and finally conclude Find a conclusion in which the statement was the most important findings, and some of the proposals that reflect use them in the future